~By Wendy Zangari
So we end a fake war with hundreds of thousands killed, while those that sit pretty in the Government have them fight a battle that has been created by them, in the Elite’s messed up minds. I read parts of the Bill and I cannot believe that it has come down to this, such insanity and for President Obama to sign off on it? Well I knew he was a puppet, but wow his puppeteer must have him sedated at this point of his presidency. Do they really feel so out of control that they need to do this to feel as though they have the upper hand?
We are not free, they have made it clear that we must obey them; these people are in charge and we are robots. We are one hell of an experiment that has turned on those that have been controlling our race for centuries. They cannot make this end well if they are doing this to their own people. Well, once the whole military wakes up and sees that they are pawns in the game that they had a hand in creating. They will end up like this guy, in the video below, who pretty much puts his middle finger to the Government and most likely the whole Defense Department. I am glad that at least one Marine woke up and got smart, watch this video of the horror stories the Elite made this Marine do and from the tone in his voice he is terribly sorry to all of those families he killed in this fake war.
This Bill is also a slap in the face to the Bill of Rights how could they do this, is this a statement that is being made here by the Elites? Also, what do the Occupy folks do? How is this going to affect them?
I am disgusted, this is not why my grandparents came to this country. They came because it was a land of opportunity. They ran away from communism, they were not free, they were never free, nor are we, and we have been stuck in this matrix for way too long. This is all a very bad, sick joke!
I can’t believe that if you have more than a weeks worth of food, you are considered a terrorist. If you have more than 7 guns, you are considered a terrorist. If you pay for all of your items in cash and do not use your Credit, ATM, or Debit card at all, you are considered a terrorist. The list goes on.
I have also posted what Nazi Germany was like in the early 1900’s. Also, if you look into Hitler’s history and any other profile similar to his, you will see that 9 times out of 10 they were abused as a child, such as Hitler. This is what happens when a child, who is defenseless, gets abused by their parents, or anyone, they become vengeful and that CAN be prevented, it is all in their upbringing. So we have to have compassion for these people, because they just are not thinking correctly and are not in their right minds.
Nazi Germany, also known as the Third Reich (German: Drittes Reich)  refers to the state of Germany when it was a totalitarian dictatorship ruled by Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party. Nazi Germany is best known for its aggressive foreign policy, its launching of World War II, and the Holocaust which resulted in the death of millions of European Jews and other minorities deemed a threat to the Aryan race.
On 30 January 1933 Adolf Hitler legally became chancellor of Germany. Although he initially headed a coalition government, he quickly eliminated his non-Nazi partners and ruled as the sole dictator. The Nazi regime restored economic prosperity and ended mass unemployment using heavy military spending while suppressing labor unions and strikes. The return of prosperity gave the regime enormous popularity and made Hitler’s rule mostly unchallenged, despite a growing resistance that culminated in the failed 20 July plot in 1944. The Gestapo (secret state police) under Heinrich Himmler destroyed the liberal, Socialist, and Communist opposition and persecuted the Jews. The party took control of the courts, local government, and all civic organizations except the Protestant and Catholic churches.
The Nazi state idolized Hitler as its Führer (“Leader”), centralizing all power in his hands. Nazi propaganda was quite effective in creating what historians call the “Hitler Myth” – that Hitler was all-wise and all-powerful, so that any mistakes or failures by others would be corrected when brought to his attention. In reality, Hitler had a narrow range of interests and decision-making was diffused among overlapping, feuding power centers; on some issues he was passive, simply assenting to pressures from whoever had his ear. All top officials still reported to Hitler and followed his basic policies, but they had considerable autonomy on a daily basis. All expressions of public opinion were controlled by propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, who made effective use of film, mass rallies, and Hitler’s skillful oratory.
In foreign policy Nazi Germany used a strategy of making aggressive demands, threatening war if they were not met. When nations tried to compromise usingappeasement, Hitler accepted the gains that were offered, then moved on to his next goal. That policy worked as Germany pulled out of the League of Nations (1933), rejected the Versailles Treaty and began to re-arm (1935), won back the Saar (1935), remilitarized the Rhineland (1936), formed an alliance (“Axis“) with Benito Mussolini‘s Italy (1936), sent massive military aid to Francisco Franco in the Spanish Civil War (1936–39), annexed Austria in theAnschluss (1938), took over Czechoslovakia after the British and French appeasement of the Munich Agreement of 1938, signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pactwith the Soviet Union to divide up Eastern Europe in August 1939, and finally invaded Poland in September 1939. Britain and France responded with World War II. In 1939-42 Germany conquered most of Europe, intending to establish a “New Order” of complete hegemony, while eliminating Jews and Slavic inhabitants of Eastern Europe. After stunning German successes in 1941-42 in the East, the Soviets counter-attacked in a series of huge, fierce battles that overwhelmed the Nazis. Germany made ineffective use of its allies and was overrun in 1945 by the Soviets from the East and the Allies from the west. The winners set out to remove all traces of Naziism and put its leadership on trial. Up to 40 million Europeans died as a result of the war. In the 21st century Hitler, Nazism, and the Holocaust are often invoked as symbols of evil in the modern world. Newman and Erber (2002) wrote, “The Nazis have become one of the most widely recognized images of modern evil. Throughout most of the world today, the concept of evil can readily be evoked by displaying almost any cue reminiscent of Nazism … “
220 years after the Bill of Rights was ratified, Congress passes the reconciled NDAA bill ‘legalizing’ the indefinite detention of American citizens.
December 15, 2011
Today is December 15. 220 years ago, a coalition of founding fathers concerned about the over-centralization of power under the United States Constitution as written succeeded at last in adding a Bill of Rights that would protect individual freedoms and limit the reach of the federal government. Thus, ten critical amendments to the Constitution were ratified by the states and entered into law in 1791.
These guaranteed rights, including that of free speech, arms, privacy and due process– among others, have not only been violated by the modern State but trampled upon and trashed through arrogant and unconstitutional legislation, executive orders & statements and a lack of common sense protection in the courts.
But today was the crossing of the Rubicon– in time for the anniversary of the Bill of Rights. The Senate has now passed the reconciled version of the NDAA, earlier passed by the House, putting into law for the first time the asserted “right” of government to indefinitely detain American citizens without trial. Nothing could be more un-American or against the Bill of Rights. The President, reversing his previous ‘threat’ to veto the bill, is now expected to sign the bill. RT appropriately writes:
Exactly 220 years to the date after the Bill of Rights was ratified, the US Senate today voted 86 to 13 in favor of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, allowing the indefinite detention and torture of Americans.
Paul Joseph Watson has already written on how the ACLU and Human Rights Watch organization blasted Obama for his “u-turn” on the vetoing the NDAA bill which contains the provision allowing the indefinite detention of American citizens. He notes that: HRW describes Obama’s about-face as a “historic tragedy for rights”. Indeed. HRW’s executive director Kenneth Roth further stated:
“By signing this defense spending bill, President Obama will go down in history as the president who enshrined indefinite detention without trial in US law… In the past, Obama has lauded the importance of being on the right side of history, but today he is definitely on the wrong side.”
But more significantly, Paul Joseph Watson highlights the fact that the Obama Administration was never concerned with rights in the consideration of this bill. He writes, “Obama’s veto threat was never about stopping detention without trial of American citizens, it was about ensuring that the federal government didn’t completely hand such powers over to the U.S. military, and enshrining into law Obama’s unconstitutional policy of targeting Americans as terrorists without the legal requirement to offer any proof.”
Like other presidents who’ve moved the football of executive overreach down the field, President Obama and his administration advisors wanted to maintain the appearance of the president’s prerogative to selectively detain Americans without trial. What George W. Bush controversially did to accused and/or potential terrorists via the War on Terror by denying them any pretense of due process, Obama has now brought to the homeland.
It is indeed a dark day for America.
The Preamble to The Bill of Rights
Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.
THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.
RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.
ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.
[Note: The following text is a transcription of the first ten amendments to the Constitution in their original form. These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what is known as the “Bill of Rights.”]
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
^ The “Third Reich” was an informal term that the Nazis adopted from a 1923 novel by Arthur Moeller van den Bruck. It suggested Germany had reached the next step beyond the “First Reich” (the Holy Roman Empire, 800–1806) and the “Second Reich” (the German Empire, 1871–1918). SeeReich for more information.
^ Evans, Richard J. The Third Reich in Power (2005) Ch. 1.
^ Albert Speer asked “why was I willing to abide by the almost hypnotic impression Hitler’s speech had made upon me?”; Inside the Third Reich: Memoirs (1980) p. 19.William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: a History of Nazi Germany (1960) makes the hypnotic point four times (pp. 109, 371, 840, 1039). Correlli Barnett states “Hitler too possessed until the end a similar hypnotic power of personality which enabled him to brain-wash the sceptical and disillusioned” Hitler’s Generals (1989) p. 2.
^ David W. Del Testa, Florence Lemoine, John Strickland (2003). Government leaders, military rulers, and political activists. Greenwood Publishing Group. p.83. ISBN 1573561533
^ a b Newman, Leonard S. and Erber, Ralph. Understanding Genocide: The Social Psychology of the Holocaust (2002) p. 244._______________
© 2011, Ready For The Shift. ™ Wendy & Greg Zangari, All rights reserved. Permission is granted to copy and redistribute these articles on the condition that the content remains complete and in tact, full credit is given to the author(s), and that it is distributed freely.